Warning: session_start(): open(/var/lib/php/session/sess_bi28ra013qsasbehq16j0oh0kg, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/ukiweg.net/public_html/index.php on line 242

Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/lib/php/session) in /home/ukiweg.net/public_html/index.php on line 242

Warning: fopen(/home/ukiweg.net/public_html/cache//4bec21f75664545ccd3c2fa546da9a12): Failed to open stream: No space left on device in /home/ukiweg.net/public_html/index.php on line 665
Regulators propose $2.25-billion fine for PG&E; in San Bruno explosion - Los Angeles Times
Advertisement

Regulators propose $2.25-billion fine for PG&E; in San Bruno explosion

California regulators have proposed that Pacific Gas & Electric Co. pay a record $2.25-billion penalty for its role in causing a fatal 2010 natural gas explosion in San Bruno, a San Francisco suburb.

The total includes a $300-million fine to be paid to the California treasury and $1.95 billion for safety upgrades to the company’s gas distribution system. About $1.5 billion would be paid by shareholders and the balance would be returned as a credit to PG&E; for already completed distribution system repairs and safeguards.

The proposed financial penalty comes almost three years after the Sept. 9, 2010, explosion of a transmission line that killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes in a neighborhood near the San Francisco International Airport.

Advertisement

PHOTOS: Top cities with falling wages

Consumer advocates praised the proposed penalty that is expected to go before the five-member California Public Utilities Commission in the fall.

The fines are overdue, said Tom Long, legal director for the Utility Reform Network, a San Francisco group that monitors the PUC.

Advertisement

“The public is still waiting for PG&E; to be held accountable,” he said. “It seems obvious that penalties should reduce PG&E;’s profits, rather than cushion PG&E;’s shareholders.”

PG&E; said it objected to paying $300 million to the state rather than investing it in pipeline safety. “In its zeal to punish PG&E;, the staff of the California Public Utilities Commission has lost sight of our important shared goal of making PG&E;’s natural gas operation the safest in the country as quickly as we possibly can,” said Tom Bottorff, senior vice president for regulatory affairs.

ALSO:

The PUC’s not the commission is used to be

Advertisement

Exemption for California PUC chief stalls budget

Record $2.25 billion fine recommended for San Bruno explosion

Advertisement
Advertisement